Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000062 181

Image

File
Download upr000062-181.tif (image/tiff; 23.4 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000062-181
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    ?*r, X. M. Sutton: (PC - Mr, W», Reinhardt - Los Angeles) */ Reference is made to your letters dated June 0, 1950 and June 29, 1950. fil* 70^35 regarding differences between statement supplied Mr. Rein­hardt, with oopy to yen, on May 10, 1950 sad accounting department records with respect to water distribution system at Las Vegas, Nevada. Iten of 1650,00 for redwood pipe installed under work order Bo. 152 should not have been included and has been excluded from the attached revised statement. Differences with respect to installations prior to December 31, l<Jh6 because of allocation of cost to various alias of pipe have been changed to that previously eetimatad as ehown on my statement dated May 8, 19U7. with respect tp subsequent installations differences in distribution of 00st have been com­posed by changing estimated allocation to agree with amounts shown on your statementwith the exception of W.Q. 625. In this case, as I interpret the data contained in your work order file, the reduction valves are connections to the k* distribution lines in which ease it is our practice to include cost of connecting fittings with the pipe being installed. Differences with respect to lengths of pipe lines installed have also been composed by changing to agree with your statement. However it is pointed out with respect to installations subsequent to December 31, 19^6, that close out reports show lengths by sites of pipe as charged in the accounts but do not state the length of pipe line in place. Because of reduction by cutting and extension Omaha - July ig# 1950 3703-1?