Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000331 100

Image

File
Download upr000331-100.tif (image/tiff; 26.12 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000331-100
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    FORM 10-59-4-10-8M S A N P E D R O , L O S A N G E L E S A N D S A L T L A K E R A IL R O A D C O M P A N A C C O U N T IN G D E P A R TM E N T i^i'' 1 4, H . I. B E T T I S , A U D I T O R Wharfage rates, contract 1061. Los Ahgeles, January 26, 1911, 1498 H. Mr. A. S. Halsted, Assistant General Counsel. Dear S i r :- Herewith I hand you my f i l e relative to wharfage allowed by the Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Company. It appears that the rates which were provided fo r in our contract with the Crescent people conflict with the rates as now provided fo r by City Ordinance 20938. This or­dinance took effect on September 27,1910, and I am enclosing a copy herewith together with contract 1061 and wish you would kindly let me have your opinion as to whether we should look to the Crescent people fo r settlement from the date the ordi­nance took effect at rates provided fo r therein, or do you consider that the contract rate should be allowed to stand. Yours tru ly, Auditor.