Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

Las Vegas City Commission Minutes, May 26, 1952 to February 17, 1954, lvc000008-424

Image

File
Download lvc000008-424.tif (image/tiff; 58.66 MB)

Information

Digital ID

lvc000008-424
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    USE PERMIT - Roland & Myrtle Tate Goldring Avenue REZONING - Harold Stocker REZONING - Geraldine Stocker REZONING - Huntridge Tract No. 1 VARIANCE - A. H. Fry Lot 25, Blk. 5 Biltmore Addn. The recommendation of the Regional Planning Commission that the application of Roland and Myrtle Tate for Use Permit to change the front yard setback line from 50 to 25 feet on property located on the north side of Goldring Avenue between Rose Street to Tonopah Drive, was considered by the Commission. The Planning Commission explained that if this Use Permit is granted, Mrs. Tate will deed right-of-way for the northerly half of Goldring Avenue, between Rose and Tonopah Drive. Thereafter Commissioner Jarrett moved the application be approved subject to the filing of the above mentioned right-of-way deed for Goldring Avenue, and the fol­lowing resolution adopted: WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of May, 1953 Roland Tate and Myrtle Tate filed an application with the Regional Planning Commission for Use Permit to change the required front yard set back from 50 feet to 25 feet from the future northline of Goldring Avenue, on property generally located south from South Rose Street to Tonopah Drive, on the north side of Goldring Avenue, in the N½ NW¼ SW¼ SW¼ Section 33, T20S, R61E, MDB&M; and WHEREAS, on May 28, 1953, the Regional Planning Commission held a public hearing on this application for Use Permit; and WHEREAS, on May 28, 1953, the Regional Planning Commission voted to recom­mend that this application be approved, as it was felt that by changing the set back required in this area, it would be the only possible way to acquire the remaining right-of-way for Goldring Avenue, and at the same time provide a uniform set back in this area when it is rezoned to R-1 (Single Family Res­idence) Use District; and WHEREAS, such decision was filed with the Board of Commissioners on June l, 1953, recommending that such Use Permit be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the recommendation of the Regional Planning Commission that the application of Roland and Myrtle Tate to change the required front yard set back from 50 feet to 25 feet from the future north line of Gold­ring Avenue, on property generally located south from South Rose Street to Tono­pah Drive, on the north side of Goldring Avenue, in the N½ NW¼ SW¼ SW¼ Section 33, T20S, R61E, MDB&M be approved subject to the condition that they dedicate the northerly half of Goldring Avenue, between Rose and Tonopah Drive, be and the same hereby is accepted. Motion seconded by Commissioner Bunker and carried by the following vote: Commis­sioners Bunker, Jarrett, Sharp, Whipple and His Honor voting aye; noes, none. Commissioner Jarrett moved the public hearing on the application of Harold Stocker to rezone the west 466 feet of the south 466 feet of the SW¼ SW¼ Section 2, T21S, generally described as being located on the northeast comer of Maryland Parkway and San Francisco Street, from R-1 to C-1 be set for July 1, 1953 at 7:30 P.M. Motion seconded by Commissioner Whipple and carried by the following vote: Commis­sioners Bunker, Jarrett, Sharp, Whipple and His Honor voting aye; noes, none. Commissioner Whipple moved the public hearing on the application of Geraldine Stocker to rezone the SW¼ SW¼ and SE¼ SW¼, Section 2, T21S, from R-1 to R-2, be held July 1, 1953 at 7:30 P.M. Motion seconded by Commissioner Jarrett and carried by the following vote: Commis­sioners Bunker, Jarrett, Sharp, Whipple and His Honor voting aye; noes, none. Commissioner Bunker moved the public hearing on the application of Thomas Oakey to rezone Lots 3 to 9, Block 2, Huntridge Tract No. 1 from R-3 to C-1 be held July 1, 1953 at 7:30 P.M. Motion seconded by Commissioner Jarrett and carried by the following vote: Commis­sioners Bunker, Jarrett, Sharp, Whipple and His Honor voting aye; noes, none. The recommendation of the Regional Planning Commission on the application of A. H. Fry for variance to construct an enlargement to a residence within five feet of the rear property line on the northeast corner of North 1st and Verdy Lane, was consi­dered by the Commission at this time. Discussion was held on this matter. Thereafter Commissioner Jarrett moved this application for variance be denied, and the following resolution adopted: WHEREAS, on the 17th day of April, 1953, A. H. Fry filed an application with the Regional Planning Commission for variance to construct and maintain an enlarge­ment to a residence within 5 feet of the rear property line, this property being generally located in an R-1 (Single Family Residence) Use District on the northeast comer of North 1st Street and Verdy Lane and is located on Lot 25, Block 5 of the Biltmore Addition; and WHEREAS, on May 28, 1953, the Regional Planning Commission held a public hearing on this application for variance and voted to recommend approval of this application inasmuch as they felt such a use would not result in material damage to other pro­perties in the vicinity; and WHEREAS, such decision was filed with the Board of City Commissioners felt that such use would result in material damage to other properties in the vicinity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners that the applica­tion of A. H. Fry for variance to construct and maintain an enlargement to a resi­dence within 5 feet of the rear property line, this property being generally located