Information
Digital ID
upr000324-060
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.V.ator Development - near Dry Lake, Clark County, Nov, Los Angeles, Jane 6, 1924, Dear Leoi . , I have your letter of June 5th and note what you aav about parties surveying around Dry Lake, ^ * over haa heB n b e L i i t i a f « S ™ s f l H * a .hJmestead Of desert entry could n oltaid facilities, I aImf ifnic ilif n Bed °t^o> itnhiionnk» tonha ta caco duenste rotf hloamceks toefa d eould be taken up, and it may be cattlemonte who are making the investigation with a view of putting down alell* r ^ rrooaadd ttoo mScraiSp ^tJhSe 1 f1o5rt^y uitp:o nwc nwih?ic 5h° tahe gwoeoldl iidse a tof obre tdher ilRlaeidl-aton da paplrsoop mraikaete apthpel iucnadteirognr otuo ntdh wea tSetra.t e En*gi neer for ppeerrmmiissssiioonn __ , . Aa aay# actual possession would protect us against any mining claims that might be located, and it would also pro* tect us against any claimant other than the government. That° is, a homestead or other attempted entry* could not- in my opin* ion be made while we are in actual possession, ^ o p m f . r . i i e a l