Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000160 76

Image

File
Download upr000160-076.tif (image/tiff; 23.24 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000160-076
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Kr. Reinhardt December 11* 1951 2* They stated that they had employed the Montgomery firm to cheek into this matter but the District ran out of money and the Montgomery firm had discontinued work* After some discussion* they agreed to re-employ the Montgomery firm to start work on this check and have a report to us along about the middle of January* X think* therefore* - | |i / it would be desirable for you to arrange to have statements made up of the new facilities Installed since December 31* 1950 and the cost thereof* the statement being brought up to December 1* 1951# if that Is possible* It may be that some of these work orders have an estimated cost and X think the statements should be broken down to show where such Jobs are completed and the actual cost* and where such jobs have not been completed the estimated cost* It may be that a third subdivision will be necessary to show work-orders outstanding upon which no work has been done and the estimated amount of such Jobs* This* in view of the fact that possibly those work-orders will have been completed prior to the final negotiations* The next question discussed was the value of the property. X drew Mr* Campbell's attention to the fact that - he had been quoted in the newspapers as fixing a value of $1*300*000 and X then reminded him of a meeting we held nearly two years ago* at which you were present* at which time you