Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000150 117

Image

File
Download upr000150-117.tif (image/tiff; 27.86 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000150-117
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    jty 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 jf y levenber 1, 1909, r9ading In part as fellows* (Page IQ of Franchise) "All service plpaa from salsa ta fee at laaat foot inside property* with proper eat off at end, shall bo pat is ana ?*< g,% expense of water Company, "more may bo a eharga of sot to excead $S.QQ allowed for eaeh tapping of water sains.* While year petitioner bellows* that the charge of §&«60 for tapping as provided In Hale 10 Is sot excessive, so long ss the existing franehlee presided for a charge of #S.OO for tapp­ing yenv petitioner requests that the fencer charge under exist­ing frenohlae be reinstated, and that with this change, Rule 10 of the Rales end Regulations be ellewed as one of the rales of the Company, • 4th. The redaction la certain sff the proposed rates filed by year petitioner when applied to the volume of water used and the matter of eoeisam m served, will not earn a saffi-oleat amount to pay the asaal and customary lntsrest on the val­ue of the aetaal physical investment In property owned by year petitioner and noeeaaary to be maintained at nil tinea in order to render an efficient and eatisfaetcry service to its patron* • WKERRFORX, year petitioner prays that your Honorable Commission reeonelder its Order in the particulars above out­lined, and allow four per cent for replaeenent or depreciation instead of two per cent; that your petitioner be allowed a