Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000070 183

Image

File
Download upr000070-183.tif (image/tiff; 26.72 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000070-183
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

Las Vega# » May %K 195** f 26 1* Sennett - L©» Angel## 00t Mr* Mm* Reinhardt Mr* R» M, Sutton Pleas# refer to your letter dated May 12, 195**# Rile 80-11, relative to documents referred to In Item 2 of Exhibit *0* attached to Agreement 113**2 dated June 1, 1953* All document# referred to in Item 2 of Exhibit *0* c,re non* available in my office* destruction of records, Mr* Peart brought out the fact that Exhibit “0“ indicates that certain records will be turned over to the District but does not state the periods which these records will cover. In sty reply to Mr. Peart I indicated that the record# to fee turned over to the District should be only the current records for the year in which the sale takes place, since the examination of the accounts will have taken place prior to or on the Sal© Date end presumably the status of all accounts on that date will have been found to be acceptable to the Water District. It is my thought, however, that this ques­tion as to the rerlod for which records will be turned over to the District should be discussed with the District authorities and an agreement reached thereon. records now in this office, which will be turned, over to the District, X am of the opinion that none of these records will need to be photostated before being turned over. At one time I had thought that possibly the “Ledger showing status and record of refunds made Subdivldere under Rule 9 Contracts'* covered by Item (b), paragraph 2, of Exhibit wG fl should be photostated since the ledger in this office shows numerous adjustments which have been made from time to time during the years, but in view of the fact that a record of refund payments, in somewhat different form, is available in the Auditor*s office, and is In agreement with the ledger in this office as to the total amounts of refunds paid, and since there will be an agreement between the water District and the vaster Company in the matter of refunds paid under each Rule 9 Agreement, I have decided there will fee no object in photostating this ledger. In my correspondence with Mr* Reart relative to With regard to the question of photostating the LRMseJp