Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000061 278

Image

File
Download upr000061-278.tif (image/tiff; 25.95 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000061-278
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Water Rate Misunderstanding - Actions of Geo. Zettler, (COPY) ^ Las Vegas, May 23, 1931. 4.210. PERSONAL Mr. P. H. Knickerbocker Referring to our conversation. I investigated with Geo. Zettler, stationary engineer, Las Vegas, in regard to his activity in connection with the water rate at this point and he advises one of his neighbors told him that there was to be a meeting held by the various property owners and this neighbor asked him to accompany him to tiis meeting. Mr. Zettler was not aware at the time he started to the meeting what it was for. After arriving he heard the discussion among those attending and claims not to have taken any part in the discussion and was not active in any way in regard to the matter. He is well-satisfied with the rate for water he is using at his home and does not feel the charge is excessive or would be if it were increased to the rate proposed. He states a petition was circulated but not by himself or any members of his family. It was presented to his wife at his home during his absence and she signed it protesting the rate. Had he known the petition was being circulated he would have requested his wife not to sign it and this request would have been followed. Mr. Zettler advised me there would be no activity on his part in regard to the rate and he would see none of his people were involved in any activity that would bring about any adverse criticism. a. R. .Wilcox