upr000283 132

Los Angeles * Inffut 29, 1951 Mr. A. X. Stoddards (CSC i Mr. V. S. Hulsisar Mr. S, N. Sutton } X attach copy #£? tha ruling w & ® % tha Puhtie Sarviaa Goaralsaioa of lawdik on the application of tha Las T«pi Iasi * Water Coapany fm aa laaraaaa l a aria* rataa for tha W V «? *aa Tagae. Shit ruling grants ua m Increase a f appiunlautely 10# mi ooapared to tha mmxtaslaljr **2$ which LYMWOo. requested. their ruling ia ao fa ll of Inaccuracies, discrepancies Mid l a p r tlaaa that ao attempt will ha node In this letter to analyse theau fa «ra now prsparlag a earafUl analysis la *Mch these it mm will ha g»ae lato la datail and w ill attempt to hare it la y»nr haada la tha course of tha next few days. |||||; Ton will aata that tha now ad attli of rates are aada effective as of Septsriwr 1( 1951* *he first decision that w ill hare to ha aada oa thla natter la whathar m will sake tha aaw rates effective la accordance with tha Cesndesioa'a ruling or poatpaaa that data until such other remedies aa wa aay alaot to try for hare haaa dad dad upon. My own feeling la* subject of course to tha opinion of our lagel Department, that wa should make tha rataa effec­tive ia aeeerdanee with tha order *trusting to tha provisioa of Sola U fa to oollaot any dafieiesolea should tha preeeat schedule ha later rm aad. I aay thla with fu ll understanding af tha possibility that tha Comal aaloa oould suspend the affaotlira data of tha present ordar pending tha resulta of any aettoa wa night take toward aodlfleatioa of the ordar. (90) days in which ta appeal this ruling to tha Cavorts. X think a daolaioa aa to whether wo should mke such aa appeal end the aacaat aathad la which tom appeal should ha aada should ha takaa aa quickly aa possible. 9ha oaalyala prepared hy tha Coast! ssioa la support of da X understand tha regulations In Vevada, wa have ninety (Signed) WM. RFJNHARDf la, Salnhardt