UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
Statement B KecoKcili tioa of the differences between the two sets of figures A « o on State****! A in determining the rate of return C omul ss ion found value of the lend to to $24,000, jet it need in ito base only the book eoet $19,828* 800 Exhibit 18* this Deduction made by the Cosed salon Oar amortisation of IfUWf Co* defense project* *fcich we eon tend ere useful to end used by the average of tlio depreoiaticm figure shown on page $ in itaa 8# is a toted ee $888,808 whereas it should be $843,808. 8m p.4 of annual report to £s@Ef« this is e difference of 8oxk*1 depreciation on the defbaee projects sub* stituted for ac&ortlftatlan. See fable 1 item 8(b), Pegs 8, its* IS » Gosnisstcn** figures Plus error in extension I 06,078.84 dal salon of the Federal income tax end •48 interest rental shown on Exhibit 18 • 98.108 of $64,886.88 98.SQ8.S6 fatal £158,500.8$ Baga 8, it on 81 * Cosed science figures Plus error In extension $683,660.00 $.10 is a differense of fatal Pag* 6# iten 58 « Coauifleion's figures $614,860.06 the utility and should not be excluded Subtotal $J67J4t,s5t3g5f.i66M Exhibit 81, Appendix 8 80.605.00 Subtotal 8i,804.Od Set Total $686,781.85 General Audi tear* s Office, Onahe, Sebr., Sopt. 8, 1068
