Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000318 30

Image

File
Download upr000318-030.tif (image/tiff; 26.42 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000318-030
Details

Member of

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

W. & P. Committee Contracts under State Water Plan January 7, 1959 Page #2 % The utility concept (responsibility of the State to make water available in the amounts and at the time needed) should apply to pricing and delivery of water at the Delta but not to distribution therefrom. Water exported from the Delta should be priced at the same per acre foot charge at the Delta to all contractors. Provi­sion may properly be made for future adjustment in charges at this point in line with changes in the State's costs of making water available there. Bond funds released by substitution of money from the Water Fund should be used to construct works to provide water at the Delta to supply contract requirements. Costs to various delivery points in the aqueduct system should be allocated on the basis of actual proportionate cost to the State for the capacity necessary for the amounts of water to be supplied at the different reaches of the aqueducts. Each contractor should share in the cost of each reach of the aqueduct in the proportion Of his contracted capacity to the total for that reach. For this purpose the contractor's maximum capacity re­quirement should be used. The total of all charges to contrac­tors for each reach of the aqueduct should be sufficient to re­pay all costs, including interest for that reach. In addition to repayment of capital costs as just indicated, contractors should pay the State the same unit price for water at each point of delivery (reach), such payments to cover all operations and maintenance costs. Costs should provide for firm aqueduct capacity rights. Contracts should be entered into only with those agencies or parties having adequate taxing power which, together with water charges and other sources of repayment will support the contracts. Water should be sold by the State to all contractors without restriction as to resale used. The Feather River and Delta Diversion project is a water storage and distribution system and hydro-electric power is an incidental feature. As power for pumping will exceed power pro­duction, electric energy developed by the project should be so