Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000278 185

Image

File
Download upr000278-185.tif (image/tiff; 26.72 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000278-185
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    full return should be allowed tbe two companies for water-right value* Rate Baaei The capital base figures upon which the two companies seek to earn a fair return are set up on the seme three bases that were developed for the fixed capital estimates. In the development of the rate base estimates the average fixed capital for the years 1949 and 1950 have been used from which has been deducted the depreciation reserve and/or the reserve requirement computed on the straight line basis; and an estimate of that part of the customer advances in aid of construction (Donations) that will be refunded; plus Working Capital. Tables E, P and 3, in the Appendix* show the development of the rate base estimates. These may be summarised for the year 1950, as follows; Production, \.ht± Water Scwpasgp roc‘ Utility Total Baals (hA&SLRRCo) Index (LVL&WCo) index Estimate index 1- Inrestment f » 7 W T O T ~ fEOT/fiERT" T O T ” I T O T ^ O T T O T T 2- Orlginal Cost 764,700 1.05 659,000 1,16 1,405,700 1.09 5-Present-Day CostlG44,400 1.41 862,600 1.57 1,907,000 1.48 In the development of these rate base figures, only recognised methods have been employed. These will now be briefly reviewed. The capital estimates have already been presented. Such capital bases have been reduced for depreciation that has accrued as represented by the retirement reserve or an estimate .of that reserve. Depreciation Reserve Requirements t Under this heading will be discussed both the retirement reserve and the amortisation of defense plant capital* tables 1, Fc/®» in which the rate base figures are