Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000229 8

Image

File
Download upr000229-008.tif (image/tiff; 26.59 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000229-008
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

^ indicate a need for measures to protect an adverse discharge condition* ”In the case of Las Vegas Valley, collection reservoirs for temporary storing and desilting prior to spreading operations could not be considered a practicable undertaking. In Willow Creek, eight miles west of Las Vegas, the W,P,A. and C,C,C, made an abortive effort at spreading water, but after a season's trial the gravels were so drowned with silt that the project was rendered useless,” Mr, Greene’s study indicates that owing to structural conditions, no part of the large areas indicated upon his Map Wo, 1 as Zone 4 contributes to the re­charge of the Artesian Bplt, and that run-off and evaporation loss greatly reduoes the recharge factor from Zones 1, 2 and 3, It is his opinion that a greater part of our recharge comes from the smaller area indicated as Zone 1, I think it is obvious that it is not possible to measure or even to accurately estimate the rate of recharge of this reservoir, so to determine whether we are withdrawing water faster than nature is recharging the supply we must depend upon observation of pro­ductivity and recorded pressures in producing wells. This record shows a decline in production in nine of our ten wells in the period 1942 to 1944 of 8.2$, indicating an average annual decline in production of 4,1$. We have recorded corresponding pressure reductions for the same period vary-ing from 3 lbs, per squ&re inoh to as high as 10 lbs, per square inch, the pressure decline in general being greater in the upper producing zone, which occurs approxi­mately 300 feet to 500 feet below the surface of the ground, than in the lower zone which extends from something over 500 feet below the surface to about 800 feet. This is significant, as practically all of the wells, other than our own, throughout the Valley tap the upper zone, and it follows that depletion should occur to a greater extent there than in the lower zone. This clearly indicates to us that, with lack of oontrol of wastage from existing wells and the issuance of permits for wells, it will only be a matter of a few years until the artesian flow ceases alto­gether. Such has been the history of all artesian fields where conservation of the underground supply has not been rigidly practiced. I do not mean to infer by this statement that immediately upon the discontinuance of artesian flow the Water Company will be unable to furnish water from the present sources for the needs of your com­munity. I do mean, however, that with the discontinuance of artesian flow springs will naturally dry up and it will be necessary to pump the wells, and that the advan*; tage now obtaining to wells throughout the Valley of securing water by merely open­ing the valves, will disappear, making it necessary for those who elect to continue production of w„ter from wells to incur the expense of installation of pumps and the constant power cost of operating and maintaining the same, with the disadvantage and expense that, as the watershed is further lowered, it will be necessary to follow the water level down and perhaps substitute different and more expensive types of pumping equipmentsto produce from greater depths. The only possible alternate supply would be fronfLEke Mead, The Colorado River water is heavily mineralized, and is therefore an extremely hard water. It is usable for domestic purposes, but must be heavily chlorinated, and as those of you who have had occasion to drink or use the water at Boulder City know, it is far different from the water you now enjoy. I have recited to you the picture as we see it, and I hope the situation will be given your most serious consideration. The problem we are all confronted with is the conservation and protection of your domestic and industrial water supply. For your own best interest every .effort should be made to bring about enactment and enforcement of ordinances and statutes to stop waste of water -to proteot the future of the area. (3)