Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

Las Vegas City Commission Minutes, February 17, 1937 to August 4, 1942, lvc000004-440

Image

File
Download lvc000004-440.tif (image/tiff; 59.61 MB)

Information

Digital ID

lvc000004-440
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Following is Mr. Smiths report: Board of City Commissioners Howell Garrison, Mayor Gentlemen: In order that my position in this all important controversial question may be clearly understood by all concerned, I am offering as a matter of record, the following: Consideration of numerous questions by various individuals and bodies well, of Block 16, its regulation and disposition has been an unsolved problem several years to my personal knowledge. The first time this matter sprang up before the present Board of City Commissioners that I know anything about was July 2, 1941 at which time an informal meeting was held at the home of Mayor Garrison with Commissioners Clark, Rubidoux, Smith and Tinch together with City Attorney Ralli and Mayor Garrison present. The subject was introduced by Mr. Ralli who proposed an Ordinance on the basis of an emergency whereby prostitution in Block 16, might become legalized, stating this would make Las Vegas the first city to legalize by license, prostitution, in the United States. I refused to cast my vote in favor of such an ordinance. This brought out considerable discussion and argument but I declined to change my position. Mr. Ralli said an unanimous vote was necessary to ordain an emergency ordinance. I assured them that while I could not change my position conscientiously, I would pass my vote rather than vote against the measure thereby take the part of a neutral. Mr. Ralli said I could not pass my vote but could vote as I chose. I then stated I would be absent when the matter come up for action and by doing so would not prevent an unanimous vote by my presence. Mr. Ralli said this would not do. At this juncture, I stated that I never would allow my name to be connected with anything which might indicate the city of Las Vegas was legalizing prostitution by license; knowingly. July 3, 1941 I called at the District Attorney's office and asked Mr. Wiley what the status of abatement proceedings instituted by Mr. J. R. Lewis were concerning Block 16. He told me the case was pending in the District Court. I called at Mr. Ralli's office and he told me he had made a research of NCL and found that a house of prostitution could not be located within 1200' of a church etc., and he believed the Espiscapol Church was within that distance. Oct. 10, 1941 Mayor Garrison issued an order directing the police department to immediately undertake suppression of prostitution wherever it may exist within the city, etc. Oct. 16, Chief of Police Frank Waite, was removed from office by a 3 to 2 vote on account of failure to comply with said order. Mr. David Mackey was appointed Chief of Police by unanimous vote. A short time after appointment of Chief Mackey, the County Sheriffs office issued gaming and tavern license to Meadows resort, similar to licenses issued several others east of Las Vegas City limits. Issuance of the licenses to the Meadows was followed closely by a suit filed in the District Court by a resident taxpayer in that vicinity resulting in a restraining order being issued by Judge Hatton. Since that time Judge Watson dismissed a demurrer involved in this case leaving said order in full force and effect. At a joint meeting between County and City Commissioners November 5th, the matter of regulation of prostitution at the Meadows resort was discussed briefly at which time I, upon request of Ira Earl, Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, stated my views