Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000265 208

Image

File
Download upr000265-208.tif (image/tiff; 26.59 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000265-208
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    V -5- dog! This situation is embarrassing and needs heroic treatment. A prescription will be indicated later. The other extreme is where the pre-war investment is so large that the additional expenditure of .$60,000 to $90,000 is mere pin money. Between these two ex­tremes falls the vast majority of the companies who finance these emergency facilities. Each management must decide into which class it belongs before reaching any conclusions as to the best method of answering its problem. Geographical Spread The "geographical spread" of the properties of a company has a definite effect upon the1solution of the problems under con­sideration. If the company has exchanges located in several States or widely separated localities with diverse climatic conditions, some minor calamity is almost certain to occur each year. It may be a sleet storm or a cyclone or flood or a dozen other unwelcome events. When the rates were established, undoubtedly considera­tion was given to the frequent occurrence of extraordinary inci­dents of this nature. If such is the case, it may be desirable for it to treat these facilities as "just another incident". This is not true, however, with the company operating in a relatively res­tricted area. It has all of its eggs in one basket and when the basket drops, all of the eggs stand the chance of being broken. Without proper precautions, although the company may not go broke, it certainly will sustain an awful jar when the show is over and we have Adolph’s skin drying in the sun on the barn door. Theoretically, at least, we have now determined just how permanent our emergency facilities are going to be; compared its cost to the size of our pocket book; and, classified our company as one with wide diversification or no diversification at all. But one more fact must be determined before we can really go to work. Does the gross revenue exceed the operating expenses by such a wide margin that an excessive return appears to be made on the investment? In some cases the reverse is true but generally these facilities are working at or near maximum capacity and the rate of return is adequate or apparently excessive. The company whose return is inadequate under present con­ditions knows right now that it is in a itight spot. The company whose return appears adequate or excessive at present is in a tight spot also, but it may not be apparent until it is too late to remedy the situation. Here is the picture today. Business is booming, revenues are high and the return on the investment generally good or excel­lent (before taxes!). There are two ways of preventing the util­ity from earning what appears to be excessive earnings. One is by reducing rates and the other is to use revenue to reduce rate bases. Each will be discussed. Rate Reduction If the net revenue appears too high, one way of reduc­ing it to a "reasonable return" is to reduce the rates, either voluntarily or at the invitation of a regulatory body. Present users of the service would benefit by such action and the finan­