Information
Digital ID
upr000334-191
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.RE: Las Vegas ripe Line IPorra SO X':'~XG8 Over expenditure M SO 17-106 lew pipe line. LOS MGEIiES, August 26th, 1918. El LB - 6 1 2 *».i\ © ' t> » COMSTOCK: Bo-gar ding t?a® attached Form *50, iIo» 17-108, 'covering over expenditure incurred on work/author 1 ze d under App’n. 1965, Las Vegas Pipe Line, received wl«/your letter of August 22nd, •• .. ,J g • - . . . Since you wrote you no doubt have. received Form SO 17-106 prepared \ ':X- \ SMB A •'?: / !, a to cover the proposed new lino# / She work performed on the old/line was practically all done in 1917 and sufficient money indjaded^ln DOE form 1 (Carry-over Jobs) to "take care of the to-tal expense. The estimated expense of constructing the new line m s not Included in PCS form 1 , as the whole of the expense is chargeable to Operation. 'JJherafore, to eovisly with instructions contained in Mr. Platt*s letter addressed to you, dated August 14th - if I interpret same correctly - two separate forms should be prepared. Apart from this it v/ould lead to complications in the accounting if the two projects were not kept separate. lours truly, s cb/h BxICL. Chief Engineer.