UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
C O P Y August 24, 1914 Honorable Board of Harbor Commissioners, City o f Los Angeles, C aliforn ia. Gentlemen:- Eeplying to your communication of the 13th In st. , requesting an opinion as to whether the American—Hawaiian Steamship Company is violatin g the provisions o f Ordinance 30259 (lew Series) is imposing a charge of but 1 2 -l/ z^ per ton for loading freight on cars from the p ile in transit shed, I beg to advise you: The relation existing between the steamship company and the shipper is very clearly set forth by Mr. T ra ffic Manager Matson’ s report to your Honorable Board under date of August 12, 1914. The City, as proprietor of the wharf, charges and receives a l l the fees fo r the use thereof mentioned in the ordinance and, as such proprietor,has no voice in the contract 'between shipper or consignee and the transportation company as to who, as between themselves, shall pay them. That is a question, i f there be a question, fo r determination by the o ffic e r or body having jurisdiction of transportation rates. X return herewith correspondence accompanying your communication. Tery tru ly yours, Albert Lee Stephens City Attorney.
