Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000092 19

upr000092 19
Download upr000092-019.tif (image/tiff; 23.5 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000092-019

Permalink

http://n2t.net/ark:/62930/d1b855m74
Details

Member of

LVLWC - proposed sale of water production facilities of UPRRC

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

VI TA BLE OF CASES PAGE Lincoln Gas & E. L. Co. v. Lincoln, 250 U. S. 256, 267................ 59, 77 Los Angeles Railway Corporation v. Railroad Commission, 29 Fed. (2d) 140 _______ __________________ |______1___________ 27, 139 La. Water Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 294 Fed. 954, at 957................ 138 Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. Michigan State Telephone Company, 200 N. W. 749..................................................................60, 78 Middlesex Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 10 Fed. (2d) 519, 524, 533..........................:____________ 40, 87, 139 City of Minneapolis v. Rand, 285 Fed. 818........................... 61, 78, 138 Mobile Gas Co. v. Patterson, 293 Fed. 208 at 221...............................138 Monroe Gaslight & Fuel Company v. Michigan Public Utilities Commission, 292 Fed. 139........................................... 35, 37, 61, 66, 78 Monroe Gaslight & Fyel Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Com­mission, 11 Fed. (2d) 319, 325......................................... ............ 29 McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Co., 272 U. S. 400............28, 50, 85 New York and Queens Gas Company v. Newton, 269 Fed. 277, 258 U. S. 178....................................... .............................1...................... 52 New York and Richmond Gas Company v. Prendergast, 10 Fed. (2d) 167 ............................................ ........... 52, 87, 103, 139, 145, 181 New York Telephone Co. v. Prendergast, 36 Fed. (2d), 54, 63........ 43 New York Telephone Co. v. Prendergast, 300 Fed. 822..31, 40, 86, 139 Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Department of Public Works, 268 U. S. 39...........1------------- — ...... .............. .............................. .. 47 Ohio Utilities Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 267 U. S. 359, 362 ______________ 4 ..................................................... ................... .. . . 42 Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Bpn Avon, 253 U- S. 287, 289................ 10 Ottinger v. Consolidated Gas Co., 272 U. S. 576................................... 31 Pacific Gas and Electric v. San Francisco, 265 U. S. 403.................. 84 pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Whitcomb, 12 Fed. (2d) 279 .............................................................. .................. ......31, 79, 85, 181 Pittsburg & W. Va. Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission, 132 S. E ; 497, 498............gj................. .................. ........... ......................... 160 Plainfield-Union Water Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm., 30 Fed. (2d) 846, at 858............................................................................................... 139