upr000207 125

v e ry co n serva tive, to s s I s based on t t l S consumption and i t summarised as fo llo w s I I d a s - $ 3 , 0 0 0 1930 - 15,300 1931 - 15,500 1932 * 15,500 1933 - to tal | 70,000 A fte r c a r e fu lly review in g recent correspondence in connection with th is su b ject, i t i s my opinion that i t i e the d e s ire o f our execu tives to avoid lo s s through sa le o f water, end former p o lic ie s may now he abandoned} in oth er words, i f G ity o f la s yogas d e s ire s to in s t a ll municipal water system, i t would he b e t t e r fo r th is e v e n tu a lity to take place now # ra th er than In 1934 a ft e r Water Company has sustained a con­sid era b le lo s e , th ere are two methods o f avoid in g a la r g e lo s e through sale o f water and they w i l l he set fo rth under sta te­ments lo e . 2 and 3. m ission th at meters w i l l he In s ta lle d , and ra te s set fo rth fo r meter se rv ic e in form 14 w i l l apply. Based on 50$ reduction in water oonsumption and H ailroad Company charging ren ta l in accordance w ith proposed new co n tra ct; a ls o , Water Company in eren tin g c a p ita lis a tio n $35,000 to cover oo&t o f meters, the re m ilt would he as fo llo w s t Maintenance and Operation 1929 14,500 In te r e s t A D epreciation - 10$ on 1116,222 . . . . 11,632 Increased ren ta l to H ailroad Company . ................ . 2, serve n o tic e on C ity and Fubli© U t i l i t i e s Corn- T o ta l Charges Revenue . . .