Information
Digital ID
upr000048-082
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Las Vega* - October ?, 1940 W 83*3*3 lr® 1® <?. Doollni Tour memo October 1st, file 0 386*4, with regard to my letter September 88th, concerning adjustment of charges on basis of percentage of water used by Railroad company and LVL&w Co. at has Vegas. I concur in your suggestion that the pro* duotion of well is roundhouse yard be eliminated from the figures you use is computing barges between the respective companies, in view of the fact that the valuation of this well was not included. As a matter of fact the well in roundhouse yard is used only in emergencies, and as 1 understand it, it was not necessary to use same at all in 1940* The main point | was Interested in Is the pro-rating of charges between the LVhdW Co. and OPRR Co., based on number of gallons used by each, as per terms of Contract Audit go. 7300. WSK'TSTSigB© cc » Sr. R. II. ‘Sutton hr. 6. C. Fish