Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000149 201

Image

File
Download upr000149-201.tif (image/tiff; 23.24 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000149-201
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Omaha - July 24, 1949 91B0 3989 Mr* X. X. Bennett: Z have negleoted to reply to your personal letter of July 17, your file 153-S-5-H, enclosing copies of Mr. Maas' letters to Mr. Hulsiser of May 17 and June 18, in connection with Las Vegas Land and later Company assessment. Z discussed the matter with Mr. Ashby and while it is apparent that failure to comply with Mr. Sexton's demand with respect to interest and depreciation may be regarded by him as affording a basis for increase of our assessment, it is not at all clear to us that his suggestions hare any proper relations whatever to the assessment value of our property. Doubtless consideration should properly be given to any improper basis of charges in connection with the regulation of water rates, but even in that event it would seam to me that the interest rate is not excessive and that over the period of the contract it has been fully warranted, even though temporarily lower rates of interest may be current as the result entirely of abnormal conditions. You have indicated that there is no demand for reduced water rates and that the rates in effect in Las Vegas are relative lower than those charged by other water companies. Z am reluctant to concede any authority in the Tax Commission to rewrite our contract or to prescribe a different basis of charges