UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
E* House Hr* 2 February 1, 1952 Ha advised Hr. Allan that ha thought a petition for rehearing could be drawn which would not ba embarrassing to ths Commission. Mr* alien than stated th£t if wa filed a petition for rehearing# ba would give It sari* eus consideration* 1 have discussed the natter with Mr* Reinhardt end we both feel that we should file a petition for rehear* tag and give the Canalsalon an opportunity to re-open tha case* If it does not do so romptly, there will ba no reasonable alternative except to proceed with tho court action* Today I have fllad a petition for re-h«®ri*ig and am enclosing to you# and sanding to each of tha parties to whoa a copy of this lottar is going# a copy thereof* If tha rehearing is granted, I propose to have the bulk of the testimony put in by member* of tho staffs of Mr* Hulsiser and Hr* Sutton* However both Hr* ioinhardt and 1 agree that Mr* ah# should ba retained to prepare some exhibits relating to a forecast of operations for tha year 1952* I have asked Hr* aha to be ready to start preparation on short notice* I will keep you advised of further developments in tha case* 1* Zm Sennatt Enel*
