upr000093 167

H. yl ^MELVENY 1885-1941 LOUIs^^YERS JOHN O’MELVENY PAUL FUSSELL WILLIAM W. CLARY HARRY L.'DUNN JAMES L.BEEBE PIERCE WORKS HOMER I. MITCHELL CLINTON LATOURRETTE GRAHAM L.STERLING, JR. W. 8. CARMAN MAYNARD J. TOLL JACKSON W. CHANCE JAMES M. IRVINE,JR. SIDNEY H. WALL RICHARD C. BERGEN WILLIAM. P. MARTIN DEANE F. JOHNSON RAY H. LINDMAN JAMES C.GREENE WILLIAM W.ALSUP JOHN A. POWELL FREDERICK N.EDWARDS ADRIAN C.STANTON LAUREN M. WRIGHT RODNEY K.POTTER PHILIP A. LOOMIS. JR. GEORGE F. ELMENDORF ROBERT W. LEWIS RUTH ANN SAYLES HOWARD J. DEARDS EDWARD C. FREUTEL.JR. FRANKLIN T. HAMILTON JAMES E. DUNLAP PHILIP F. WESTBROOK,JR. HUGH L.MACNEIL CLYDE E.TRITT ERNEST M. CLARK, JR. EVERETT B.CLARY BENNETT W. PRIEST JAMES E.CROSS E.HARLEY WALTHER JAMES W. BEEBEi; RICHARD B.RAGLAND WARREN M. CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM E.WILEY,JR. RICHARD F. IGL ROY E. POTTS ROGER WILLIAMS R. BRADBURY CLARK GILBERT E. HAAKH WENDELL B. WILL WILLIAM L. SCOTT EDWARD B. SMITH,m SUBJECT LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* LAW OFFICES OF O’MELVENY & MYERS E«C» R. iff 20 1953 433 SOUTH SPRING STREET LOS ANGELES 13 May- 18 th 195 3 i ? %y$'' 6920 SUNSET BOULEVARD HOLLYWOOD 28 CABLE ADDRESS"MOMS” IN REPLY REFER TO b-2805 Edward C. Renwick, Esq. Assistant General Solicitor Union PacifiG Railroad Company I4J4.2 West Sixth Street Los Angeles ll^., California Dear Ed: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of May l^th enclosing the latest revisions made by you in the proposed agreement between Union Pacific and the Water District. I have examined the same and revised a portion thereof. I am enclosing herewith the following material as revised by myself: 1. Section 5» 2. Section 7» 3. Section ilj. 1 Section 15, and 5. Page 1 of Exhibit Section 5 has been revised principally by incor­porating all provisions relative to the relocation work in Section Accordingly, all the provisions contained in Section 7 relative to the disbursement of the relocation funds have been incorporated into Section 5. The last por­tion of your Section 5» relating to the granting of a license to the District for the existing lines which are to be re­located, have been inserted as subparagraph (m) of Section 1. Section 7 has been revised by the deletion of the escrow provisions relative to the disbursement of the re­location funds. The form of it has also been revised by listing as a, b, c and d the various conditions upon which the escrow is to be closed. Section liq. has been revised primarily by the clarification of the language relative to termination on or after December 31, 1953*