Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
I ' in BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEVADA ! ON REMAND FROM THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ORMSBY \<bV IAS VEGAS LAND AND WATER COMPANY, a corporation, I 8s S Doc Let No. 127 Court No. I8OU5 Plaintiff, vs. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF N E V ADA , Defendant. tX$ x By the Commission: O P I N I O N CASE IgSTORY The Las Vegas Land and Water Company, under date of January 22, 1951, 1 filed proposed new rates, rul.es and regulations which it desired to Become ef1fect-ive on February 26. 1951 • The schedale is identified as I & S Docket No. 127\. The effective date was suspended for sixty (60) days from and after \ February 26, 1951> and the matter set down for public hearing at las Vegas on April 3, 1951. The hearing, consuming three days, was then recessed to June 5> 1951 1\. a? nd completed on Jun\e 7, 1951". * By stipulation of counsel the proposed tariff was twice suspended, the Commission being given until September 1, 1951 to render its decision. On August 2^. 1951, the Commission rendered Its opinion and entered its order. On September 2h, 1951, The Las Vegas Land and Water Company petitioned the Commission for reconsideration, or, in the alternative, for rehearing. After study of the record, on October 8, 1951> the Commission rendered its opinion and entered itslorder denying the petition of the applicant. On November l6, 1951, The Las Vegas Land and Water Company filed