UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
V which are not part of the record in this case and which your petitioner had no opportunity to explain or refute, * • f II The rates prescribed by this Commission in said order are confiscatory and deprive your petitioner of its property without due process of law in violation of Amendment XIV to the Constitution of the United States and Section 8 of Article I to the Constitution of the State of Nevada. (Nevada Compiled Laws - 1929, Section 29) III * Said opinion and order are not supported by and kre contrary to the evidence received by the Commission at the hearings in the above-entitled case on April 3rd to 5th, 1951 and June 5th to ?th, 1951, -ooOoo- Upon the above-mentioned general grounds your petitioner alleges that the said opinion and order are unreasonable and unlawful in the following respects: Deficiency in Rate Base of Railroad Company A - The rate base of $460,061.88 which the Commission found to be the reasonable rate base for the water production facilities and water-bearing lands of Union Pacific Railroad Company, hereinafter called "Railroad Company", is not based upon the evidence of record and is grossly insufficient because: - 2 -
