upr000034 53

N Im Angeles, April IS, lit®* 831&*K Map. fe i| ftlimi I haw the following self-explanatory letter from Mr. Cray wider date April 8* If tit *I'tev» executed and return herewith original aM approval copy of deed presented with your letter March 28th, file 9215-H, ooawylng to Lloyd S» Hlle lote 81. end 38, Bloch 2S, together with five-room house situated thereon, in ClarkTs has Veg&e Towneite, cold for consideration of IS,IDO. Wh<m execution of this deed has been completed by attest and ®ml by the Secretary, as well as notarial acknowledgment of his signature, will you kindly have the full details of execution and date inserted in two extra copies and return them to me. In this connection, the deed as you sub- Blitted it contained form for acknowledgment by the Secretary only. In another case of a deed from the Las Vegas land and Water Company some time ago, where­in acknowledgment for the Secretary only was prowldod, the Contract Attorney referred the matter to hr. Pettit, asking if it should not also he acknowledged by the Prosilent. Mr. Pettit replied that while he had no file on the particular subject, assuming that the deed mm approved by Mr. hfcffamee as Attorney for hereon, aoknowledisaent by the 'President should obviously be orowided for. In view of this prior advice, we tore arranged to add separate acknowledgement by the President to the Mile deed herewith enclosed. It is suggested ? a --^nii" ?- Hn iiiiigM— -“***— Legal m- that this be called to the attention of the p&rtment.* y. H. ft er cc Mr. 0. C. %rry, Mr, Charles Adams, Mr. i» li» ?'•9 %