upr000278 116

Omaha - July IS, 1950 3703-1 Mr. B. M. Sutton: (CC 4 Mr. Vm. Belnhardt - Los Angeles) Beference Is mads to your letters dated June 8 , 1990 and June 29* 1950, file 70*1-35 regarding differences between statement supplied Mr. Beln­hardt r with copy to you, on May 10, 1990 and accounting department records with respect to water distribution system at Las Vegas, Nevada. Item of $650.00 for redwood pipe Installed under work order Ho. 152 should not have been Included and has been excluded from the attached revised statement. Differences with respect to installations prior to December 3 1 , 19H6 because of allocation of cost to various slses of pipe have been changed to that previously estimated as shown on my statement dated May 8, 19*4-7- With respect to subsequent Installations differences in distribution of cost have been com­posed by changing estimated allocation to agree with amounts shown on your statement with the exception of W.O. 625* 7n this case, as 1 interpret the data contained in your work order file, the reduction valves are connections to the h" distribution lines in which case it is our practice to include cost of connecting fittings with the pipe being installed. Differences with respect to lengths of pipe lines Installed have also been composed by changing to agree with your statement. However it is pointed out with respect to installations subsequent to December 3*-. 19^. that close out reports show lengths by slses of pipe as charged in the accounts but do not state the length of pipe line in place. Because of reduction by cutting and extension