Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000092 35

Image

File
Download upr000092-035.tif (image/tiff; 26.72 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000092-035
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

,\ r O E* E. s. , ,.1* R* JUN 12& J m JUH 2 7 1952 - / / Los Angeles , Jans 25, 1952 Mr. Ms. Reinhardt: (2) Coe Mr. M* «• Bennett - 2 ) Mr, a . L. Adamson ) Mr. w. H. Rulslser ) Mr. F. A. Hubbard ) Referring t© the natter of proposed sale of water production facilities owned by- LosAngiTii RrSIlT'LlR*— Railroad Company and water distribution facilities owned by Las Vegas Land and Water Company at Las Vegas to the Las Vegas Valley *ater District: During the past three weeks conferences hare been held with engineers for the Water District In this of­fice. Engineers present were as follows: For the Water District: Mr. Janes It. Montgomery, Consulting Engineer Mr. ft* £• Iberia Mr. H. R. Bolton Hr* W illia m J. Carroll For the Railroad Company: Mr* F. A* Hubbard Mr. 1. R. Maag During these conferences the appraisals prepared for the above mentioned companies, both by the Railroad Company engineers and the engineers for the Water Dis­trict, were thoroughly discussed and comparisons mads of the values dtveloped for each of the companies on ths basis of cost of reproduction new and cost of reproduc­tion new less depreciation as of December 31, 1950. The District Engineers have accepted our figures as to quan­tities. I am submitting herewith two copies of a tbree-pags statement dated June Id, 1952, showing comparison of val­ues arrived at in the appraisals of the Railroad Company