upr000288 9

Hr* wm. Reinhardt December 11, 1951 " ' 4. They seemed to be rather hesitant to write such a letter and Hr. Hamilton, representing the O'Melveny firm and also the-District, felt that the prospective purchaser of the bonds should state what provisions they feel should be incor­porated in sueh bonds before they would be accepted, X told him X thought that since his firm was employed it ;.f ? to pafi:sp|s ? u. po•' nV.:, the proceedings of the District and would probably have to give a report as to the legality of the bonds, that such Information should c m e from than or from the District, The matter was therefore left in abeyance and X hope to get in touch with Hr, Hamilton in the near future in an effort to ascertain just who is going to initiate this part­icular phase of the matter. The next question brought up was with respect to our dismissing the present application for discontinuance of installation of future water mains or the making of any new water connections, X told them that at the present time X would not recommend dismissal of this application and that those were your views, X explained to them that the applica­tion had been filed approximately six months ago and although it received considerable publicity in the newspapers, no effort 0 \ was made by anyone to conserve water in the city and that no one in the city paid any attention to the application and that many new subdivisions have been started since the application was filed.