Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
Mr. Wm. Reinhardt Page 5 July 6, 1951 The Commission, in a very lengthy opin ion, d iscu ssed the a v a i l a b i l i t y o f w ater to the c i t i e s served by the C a lifo r n ia Water & Telephone Company, p a r t ic u la r ly the c i t i e s o f Chula V is ta and N atio n al C ity, and a d jo in in g t e r r it o r y in San Diego County, and found that there was a g re a t excess o f water d e liv e re d to those two p a rtic u la r c i t i e s over and above the useage to which they were e n t it le d from the San Diego County Water A uth ority which was o b ta in in g w ater through the San Diego Aqueduct, a branch o f the Colorado R iv er Aqueduct o f the M etrop olitan Water D is t r ic t o f Southern C a lifo r n ia . The Commission a ls o found that the two r e s e r v o ir s o f the w ater company with a capacity o f 52,000 acre fe e t , p re se n tly have useable storage o f approxim ately 6,000 acre f e e t , which the a p p lic an t estim ates would be reduced to 2,500 acre fe e t by December 31, 1951. The Company has been g e tt in g excess w ater fo r the c i t i e s in question from c e rta in su rp lu s w ater from the C ity o f San Diego and has been n o t if ie d th at the City o f San Diego would re q u ire i t s f u l l allotm ent o f Colorado R iv er Water commencing May 1, 1951. The Commission a ls o found th at there were prelim in ary p lan s and d esigns fo r con struction o f a second b a r r e l o f the San Diego Aqueduct, which would be completed in 1953 o r 1954, and which would e n t it le a p p lic a n t to an a d d itio n a l supply o f w ater, which a s a m atter o f fa c t would only make up the d efic ie n c y now overcome by the use o f the surplus w ater made a v a ila b le by the City o f San D iego. The Commission thereupon issu e d i t s Order perm ittin g amendment to Rule No. 2 o f the Rules and R egu lation s o f the Sweetwater D is t r ic t o f - the ap p lican t by adding to s a id ru le the fo llo w in g language: "No a p p lic a tio n fo r the extension o f se rv ic e to any su b d iv isio n , as h e re in a fte r d efin ed , w i l l be granted nor se rv ic e rendered to such su bd ivisio n u n less a p p lic a tio n th e re fo r has been made on or p r io r to A p r il 13, 1951, except as h e re in a fte r provided. "A su b d iv isio n i s d efin ed as any lan d o r lan d s, d iv id e d o r proposed to be d iv id e d , f o r the purpose o f s a le or le a s e , immediate or fu tu re , in to f iv e (5 ) o r more lo t s or p a r c e ls .