Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
eity within which it shall theretofore have lawfully commenced operations or for an extension into territory either within or without the city or town contiguous to its railroad, line, plant or system and not then served by a public utility of like character.” The record also indicates that the Company had made no effort to increase its storage capacity and that no effort has been made by the Company to acquire any additional supply of water although the record indicates that there are other flowing wells within close proximity to the Company’s water system that could be acquired and the waters from which would then be available to augment the present supply. The record indicates no effort has been made by the Company to acquire any other water supply to meet the needs of the demands made on the utility for service as promised by theCompany when it acquired its franchise and certificate of public convenience and necessity, but contrariwise, the Company seeks to limit its service to those customers which it already has. Since it appears that there will be sufficient water to serve the old customers and to meet the demands of the reasonable number of new customers as indicated in Hr. Haag’s testimony, this Commission must rule against the motion as made by the Company to permit the adoption of Rule 9.5 to be placed in operation on or before June 1, 1953. The Commission finds: 1 - that the Company must under its franchise -6-