Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000149 93

Image

File
Download upr000149-093.tif (image/tiff; 26.75 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000149-093
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    f 0 f S ' M cNa m e e & M oISTa m e e LEO A. MCNAMEE FRANK MCN AM EE , JR, A T T O R N E Y S AT LAW E L PO R T AL BUILD ING September 15, 19*+9 L a s V e g a s , N e v a d a Mr. E. E. Bennett General Solicitor Union Pacific Railroad Company *+22 West Sixth Street Los Angeles 1*+, California Dear Ed: I have yours of September 1*+, relative to the proposed Las Vegas City Ordinance imposing a gross earnings tax on public utilities. Section 10 of Chapter 17 of the Las Vegas City Code imposes a flat quarterly sum on certain public utilities,- namely: Telephone Companies $500.00, Gas Companies $200.00, Water Companies $*+00.00, and electric light companies $*+00.00, except water companies whose monthly gross sales are less than $3,000.00, upon which the quarterly license is $5. The first part of the first paragraph of the pro­posed ordinance was taken from the existing ordinance ver­batim, including the words Mor operates any other public utility" but the existing ordinance then lists only the four above named utilities, and makes no provision for the amount to be charges for "other public utilities". I feel certain that railroad companies and other interstate utilities can be excepted. No provision in the general ordinance is made for the refund or credit of excess payments. A preliminary meeting was held last night, and I understand that no action will be taken on the ordinance until sometime next week. LEO A. McNAMEE LAM:jh