UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
4 To: Mr, W.R, Bracken: 1-23-42 rights and in general were comparable with the land sold to —Miller et al. However, it should be noted that except for the Russell sale these lands adjoined a developed subdivision and were in the line of growth of the City and that values had generally increased for lands available for subdivision purposes. About ten years had elapsed since 1913>ln which time the growth of the City has become assured. This consideration did not apply as to the Russell parcel in the same degree A& in the other sales and I would say the value of the Russell parcel would have been #60.00 per acre in 1913 and it ion on that date would be applicable to the
