Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

Las Vegas City Commission Minutes, November 7, 1949 to May 21, 1952, lvc000007-243

Image

File
Download lvc000007-243.tif (image/tiff; 58.04 MB)

Information

Digital ID

lvc000007-243
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    ASSESSMENT DISTRICT The Mayor announced that this was the time and place designated for the Board of Commissioners NO. 200-3 and the Ex-Officio City Assessor of the City of Las Vegas, Nevada, to meet and review the Public Hearing assessments and hear any objection to said assessment which may be made on the proposed im- Assessment Roll provements in Assessment District No. 200-3, as shown on Assessment Roll No. 16-1950. The Mayor then asked if any written objections concerning said assessment roll had been filed in the office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk answered there had been no objections filed in her office prior to said meeting. The Mayor then publicly asked if anyone desired to make any objection, suggestion or comment, or raise any question concerning said special assessment roll. No such objection, suggestion, comment or question was made or raised. The Mayor thereupon publicly announced that no objection, suggestion, comment or question had been made or raised, written or otherwise by any party in interest, or otherwise, to the said assessment roll. Commissioner Moore moved that the hearing on this Assessment Roll No. 16-1930 be adjourned until after the construction contract has been let to-wit: January 17, 1951, at which ad- journed meeting the Assessment Roll will be corrected br revised before confirmation to correct typographical or clerical errors and to modify all the assessments if the construc­tion price should prove to be substantially different from the estimated price. Motion seconded by Commissioner Peccole and carried by the following vote: Those voting "Aye”: Commissioner Bunker Commissioner Moore Commissioner Peccole Commissioner Whipple Mayor Cragin Those voting "Nay": None ASSESSMENT DISTRICT The Mayor announced that this was the time and place designated for the Board of Commissioners NO, 100-2 and the Ex-Officio City Assessor of the City of Las Vegas, Nevada, to meet and review the as- Public Hearing sessments and hear any objection.to said assessment which may be made on the proposed improve- AsSessment Roll ments in Assessment District No. 100-2, as shown on Assessment Roll No. 12-1950. The Mayor then asked if any written objections concerning said assessment roll had been filed in the office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk answered there had been no objections filed in her office prior to said meeting. The Mayor then publicly asked if anyone desired to make any objection, suggestion or comment, or raise any question concerning said special assessment roll. No such objection, suggestion, comment or question was made or raised. The Mayor thereupon publicly announced that no-objection, suggestion, comment or question had been made or raised, written or otherwise by any party in Interest, or otherwise, to the said special assessment roll. Commissioner Moore moved that the hearing on this Assessment Roll No. 12-1950 be adjourned until after the construction contract has been let to-wit: February 7,. 1951, at which ad- journed meeting the Assessment Roll will be corrected or revised before confirmation to correct typographical or clerical errors and to modify all the assessments if the construc­tion price should prove to be substantially different from the estimated price. Motion seconded by Commissioner Whipple and carried by the following vote: Those voting "Aye": Commissioner Bunker Commissioner Moore Commissioner Peccole Commissioner Whipple Mayor Cragin Those voting "Nay”: None ASSESSMENT DISTRICT The Mayor announced that this was the time and place designated for the Board of Commissioners NO, 100-4 and the Ex-Officio City Assessor of the City of Las Vegas, Nevada, to meet and review the as- Public Hearing sessments and hear any objection to said assessment which may be made on the proposed improve- Assessment Roll ments in Assessment District No. 100-4, as shown on Assessment Roll No. 17-1950. The Mayor then asked if any written objections concerning said assessment roll had been filed in the office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk answered there had been no objections filed in her office prior to said meeting. The Mayor then publicly asked if anyone desired to make any objection, suggestion or comment, or raise any question concerning said special assessment roll. No such objection, suggestion, comment or question was made or raised. The Mayor thereupon publicly announced that no objection, suggestion, comment or question had been made or raised, written or otherwise by any party in interest, or otherwise, to the said special assessment roll. Commissioner Whipple moved that the hearing on this Assessment Roll No. 17-1950 be adjourned until after the construction contract has been let to-wit: January 17, 1951, at which ad­journed meeting the Assessment Roll will be corrected or revised before confirmation to cor­rect typographical or clerical errors and to modify all the assessments if the construction price should prove to be substantially different from the estimated price. Motion seconded by Commissioner Peccole and carried by the following vote: Those voting "Aye": Commissioner Bunker Commissioner Moore Commissioner Peccole Commissioner Whipple Mayor Cragin Those voting "Nay": None