Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000163 34

Image

File
Download upr000163-034.tif (image/tiff; 26.72 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000163-034
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    #2 - Mr. Wm. Reinhardt November 15, 1950 In summary form the results for the forecasted year 1950 are: Present Rates Investment Cost Original Cost Present-Day Cost Revenues #2 2 2 ,0 0 0 #2 2 2 ,0 0 0 #2 2 2 ,0 0 0 Expenses 221,013 231,110 269,348 Net Revenue 987 (9,110) (47,348) Rate Base 579,700 666,800 854,900 Rate of return 0.17$ None None ( ) Red figure. It is thus seen that not only will the Water Depart­ment of the Las Vegas Land and Water Company fail to earn a air return on the capital employed in rendering the water service, but it will fail to earn its costs of operation be­fore any return. In other words, Its operations are estimated to be in the red for 1950 and future years, irrespective of the capital base used - except for the Investment basis wherein net revenue is just slightly more than expenses no amount for return. with practicallyJ ^ ,, , £ return has been used as reasonable in determin-fionrg 1t9he5 0 daerfei ciase nfcoyl lionw se:arnings. Such deficiencies as developed With Federal Income Tax Rate of 58# Est’d. Gross Revenue needed n under Present Rates Deficiency in Gross Revenue Per cent increase needed With Federal Est'd. Gross Revenue needed " M I under Present Rates Deficiency in Gross Revenue Per cent increase needed Investment __ Cost Original Cost Present-Day Cost #279,450 #298,328 #355,520 2 2 2 ,0 0 0 2 2 2 ,0 0 0 2 2 2 ,0 0 0 # 57,450 # 76,328 #133,520 25.88 34.38 60.14 Income Tax Rate of 45$ #295,988 #316,307 379,495 2 2 2 ,0 0 0 f 73,988 33.33 2 2 2 ,0 0 0 # 94,307 42.48 2 2 2 ,0 0 0 fl57,495 70.94