Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
W aters - L as V egas S p rin g s Los Angeles, December 16, 1924. Mr. MeNamee: R eferrin g to your l e t t e r o f December 3d, and our several conferences, in regard to establishm ent o f t i t l e to the waters o f Las Vegas B ig Springs: I understand your p o s itio n to be that our t i t l e to the f u l l flow o f these springs is complete in that a l l o f the waters have been put to a b e n e fic ia l use fo r many years. You recommend, however, that we submit to the State Engineer o f Nevada p ro of o f th is ownership. An in spection o f the com pilation o f the water laws o f Nevada, which you have fu rnished, does not in d ica te c le a r ly to my mind that proof o f said ownership is necessary. The statu tes seem to contemplate the adju dication o f r e la t iv e rig h ts on streams where there are severa l users, o r where there are c o n flic t in g claims to the waters o f the stream. The l e t t e r o f the S tate Engineer which accompanied your l e t t e r suggests the a d v is a b ility o f our f i l i n g "a proof o f app ro p ria tio n " and "the gain in g o f c e r t i f i c a t e s . " As I understand your construction o f the. law, i f we f i l e d proof o f ownership, i t would be necessary to show upon what lands the water has been put to a b e n e fic ia l use. I t might be that we could not show use on a l l - o f the lands embraced w ith in the Clark Ranch. In your opin ion, would a c e r t i f i c a t e issued by the State Engineer lim it our rig h t o f use to the lands to which the use had h ereto fo re been applied? And i f such c e r t if ic a t e were so lim ite d , could we at some future time change the place o f use? I think these matters are o f considerable Importance, because we would not d e sire to accept a c e r t if ic a t e lim itin g in anywise our r ig n t to use th is water on the lands owned by the two companies. Stated another way: Would the advantage to be gained from making a m atter o f record our t i t l e to the property be subjected to any lim ita tio n s by a c e r t i f i c a t e issued by the engineer covering such rig h ts? X would lik e to have you consider these questions. Would I t not be a good plan to w rite to the S tate Engineer in response to h is l e t t e r that the t i t l e to a l l o f the waters