Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
Mr. Wm. Reinhardt Page 5 The Commission, in a very lengthy op in ion , d iscussed the a v a i l a b i l i t y o f w ater to the c i t i e s served by the C a lifo r n ia Water & Telephone Company, p a r t ic u la r ly the c i t i e s o f Chula V is ta and N atio n al C ity, and a d jo in in g t e r r it o r y in San Diego County, and found that there was a g re a t excess o f water d e liv e re d to those two p artic u la r c i t i e s over and above the ueeage to which they were e n t it le d from the San Diego County Water A uth ority which was o b ta in in g w ater through the .San Diego Aqueduct, a branch o f the Colorado R iv er Aqueduct o f the M etrop olitan Water D is t r ic t o f Southern C a lifo r n ia . July 6, 1951 The Commission a ls o found that the two r e s e r v o ir s o f the w ater company with a cap acity o f 52,000 acre fe e t , p re se n tly have useable storage o f approxim ately 6,000 acre fe e t , which the a p p lic an t estim ates would be reduced to 2,500 acre fe e t by Deoember 31, 1951. The Company has been g e t t in g excess w ater fo r the c i t i e s in question from c e rta in su rplu s w ater from the C ity o f San Diego and has been n o t if ie d that the City o f San Diego would re q u ire i t s f u l l allotm en t o f Colorado R iv er Water commencing May 1, 1951. The Commission a ls o found th at there were prelim in ary p lan s and designs fo r con struction o f a second b a r r e l o f the San Diego Aqueduct, which would be completed in 1953 o r 1954, and which would e n t i t le a p p lic a n t to an a d d it io n a l supply o f w ater, which a s a m atter o f fa c t would only make up the d e fic ie n c y now overcome by the use o f the surplus w ater made a v a ila b le by the C ity o f San Diego. The Commission thereupon issu e d i t s Order perm ittin g amendment to Rule No. 2 o f the Rules and R egu lation s o f the Sweetwater D is t r ic t o f the a p p lic an t by adding to sa id ru le the fo llo w in g language: "No a p p lic a tio n fo r the extension o f se rv ic e to any su b d iv isio n , as h e re in a fte r d efin ed , w i l l be granted nor se rv ic e rendered to such su bd ivisio n u n less a p p lic a tio n th e re fo r has been made on o r p r io r to A p r il 13, 1951, except as h e re in a ft e r provided. "A su b d iv isio n i s d efin ed as any land o r la n d s, d iv id e d o r proposed to be d iv id e d , f o r the purpose o f s a le o r le a s e , immediate o r fu tu re , in to f iv e (5 ) o r more l o t s or p a r c e ls .