Image
Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
SECTION 3. Any person, firm, or corporation violating the provisions of this ordinance shall upon conviction he fined not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) or imprisoned in the City Jail for not more than six (6) months, or by a combination of such fine and imprisonment. SECTION 4. That by reason of the fact that certain businesses in the City of Las Vegas are in immediate and serious need of the benefits to be derived from the installation and maintenance of advertising signs in the setback distance, it is hereby declared that an emergency exists and that this ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk and Clerk of the Board of Commissioners of the City of Las Vegas shall cause this ordinance to be published once a week for two successive weeks immediately following its final reading and adoption in the Las Vegas Review Journal, a daily newspaper published in said City, and this ordinance shall become effective immediately following the second publication thereof. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED, this 4th day of January, 1956. ATTEST: /s/ C.D. BAKER________________ C.D. BAKER, Mayor /s/ SHIRLEY BALLINGER SHIRLEY BALLINGER, City Clerk Commissioners voting in favor of the adoption of the foregoing ordinance were as follows; Those voting "Aye": Commissioners Bunker, Fountain, Sharp, Whipple and Mayor Baker. Those voting "Nay": None Absent: None APPROVED: /s/ C.D. BAKER___________ ATTEST: C.D. BAKER, Mayor /s/ SHIRLEY BALLINGER SHIRLEY BALLINGER, City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF NEVADA, ) COUNTY OF CLARK ) ss. A.F. SCHELLACK, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is Foreman of the LAS VEGAS REVIEW - JOURNAL, a daily newspaper, of general circulation, printed and published at Las Vegas, in the County of Clark, State of Nevada, and that the attached was continuously published for a period of two (2) insertions from January 9, 1956 to January 16, 1956 inclusive, being the issues of said newspaper for the following dates, to-wit: January 16, 1956. That said newspaper was regularly issued and circulated on each of the dates above named. /s/ A.F. SCHELLACK Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17th day of January, 1956 /s/ NEOLA GIERHART NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA My Commission Expires April 14, 1957 ORDINANCE NO. 688 AN ORDINANCE TO REPEAL. ORDINANCE NOS. 586 and 632 AND TO AMEND CHAPTER 16, CODE OF LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, 1949, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. ALL DEALING WITH THE SALE OF DETOXICATING LIQUORS, BY PROVIDING THE BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF LIQUOR LICENSES; PROVIDING FOR TYPES OF LIQUOR LICENSES; PROVIDING FOR LICENSE FEES THEREFOR; PROVIDING PROCEDURES FOR REVOCATION OF LICENSES; PROVIDING OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATED THERETO; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREWITH; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE. The Board of Commissioners of the City of Las Vegas do ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Ordinances 586 and 632 are hereby repealed. SECTION 2. Hereafter, the issuance of package liquor licenses including shopping centers and grocery stores, shall be based on population,limiting the number of licenses issued to one to each 1000 population in the City of Las Vegas, Nevada, provided that liquor licenses heretofore issued by the appropriate governing body to businesses located in an area which has thereafter been annexed to the City of Las Vegas shall not be deemed prohibited by the limitation of this ordinance. Such licensee may be granted a similar license by the City as that which the said licensee had prior to the time of annexation; provided that the applicant is approved for holding such license by the City Commission. If any license provided for in this section should be revoked for any reason, no new license shall be issued until the population of the City of Las Vegas is such that the terms of this section can be complied with. SECTION 3. Section 2 of Chapter 16, Code of Las Vegas, Nevada, 1949, as amended by Section 1 of Ordinance 483, is amended to read as follows: DEFINITIONS: For the interpretation of this ordinance unless the context indicates a different meaning: