upr000330 121

Q. Would the payment, in whole or in part, of a claim in itv it ^ to litiga«tre,u awihe‘rte “th•e Sno*nS-l-ia%biS'.-- Bmlii3nUd 05of/ 5thh e aftftfoir9nr ey1 3 fcolre tarhley Ceomsptaanbyl,i sbhee d ini n atnvh e tsoe nsteh e ap evniaolltaiteiso nf oorf tvhiiosl atlaiwn,g tohTe^ ltaew?o t t' hTS^ri^^ 7/e w ou ld like to say th a t policy cla im s o f things or paying0 fmto9nni,ebse ownh iracahd 0 int h©t hee xmciunsed offor thdeoing payer was nothing more or less in e?feofthL a retete can noAItT SbTeO R:s etCtllaedi mmse rienl wyh itcoh coitn ciils iactlee art het hearhi«t miasv *n1o n,vn ,+ even like the flood cases at Kansas Gitv thR^n"?as a cases element, of doubt aa to the ulu£a?e o J & m e i n t L S ' 11,8?, iogoamtpiroonm.i aea nodr fotro tahvaoti dr elaistoing abtoinona mfide psSeSttulSeSmeun!t “ a1‘lt" XXII. Will it be lawful under the amendments to the lav/ to §pu^rpso. s^er a'lolff P°snreteaktiinogn ltooc apteiornsso nfso wrh oi ndtursatvreile sf,o r itthe b"ee ^fp, rpol d0(u1ue°ttiivv!e uonned,e rasntdJ odi f the&stt abtlbi® shiendd,u sbternye fwiicina l to the carrier who gives the transportation? ANSWER: no-. XXIII. It fflvu *P0Qi*l rates on freight * B ! f p 'a purpose o f building aid estaWi; W-ng a new industry? H V <i * o 4 * a — - . . . . _____. . . . t h f i ,0 ? r , j y u R *im i§t!S i2 % I 2 i8 ^ u r *t# i whlo& w e lower ; \- ** snipped to a moiemr*o6haasn t foorr tanhey cso«nmseittnee “ “ !*• J f W J j i I f a p S w S t o K k aaa to be established, or a boat sugar t or a saw-m ill, or a sm elter, would it be