UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
Roj I I | Docket Ko. 127 Los Angelos, February 4* & f$£ . 4705-11-22 Mr* ¥. H. Hulsizer: {cc * Hr* A. M* Stoddarc Hr. Its.* Reinhardt Hr. W. t, Rouse Mr. Jt* M. Sutton) In the event the Petition for Rehearing which I filed February 1st with the Nevada Public Service Commission is granted, I anticipate an early hearing* At that hearing I believe it will be desirable to produce evidence concerning the Investment cost and the original cost of the facilities of the Railroad Company and of the Water Company similar to the exhibits which were prepared by you with respect to the period ending Decern bar 31, 1950. The exhibits previously prepared by you refer to the work orders under which the work was done. I suggest that you confer with Mr. Sutton’s office to see that there is no discrepancy between the totals for the work orders shown on your exhibit and the totals for the work orders shown on exhibits which I have asked Mr, Sutton to prepare for a re-hearing. 1 will wire you as soon as 1 learn if the Petition for Rehearing has been granted and shall appreciate it if you will be ready to promptly prepare and forward to me at least 15 copies of such statements • g, 1 . Bennett
