Information
Digital ID
upr000212-083
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Mr. Strong: ff May 2, 1940. the water in prior to a thorough setting. It is noted that there is a m a r k e d decrease in the flow from the Little Spring as recorded in 1938, w h i c h was at that time 1,001,000 G.P.Day, a decrease of 276,240 gallons per day or a p p r o ximately 27$. However, the transmission m a i n from the Little Spring to the weir b o x at the settling ba s i n appears to be full to capacity. There is a q u e s t i o n in m y m i n d whe t h e r the cleaning out of the Middle (open) Spring has had a n y thing to do w i t h the d e c r e a s e in production of the Little Spring; this ma t t e r must be w a t c h e d very closely. Yours v e r y truly, WA L T E R Rt BRACKEN, Vice-President. cc - Mr. W m Reinhardt.