Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
( ML O ’ *c 05 itfcyv Mr. Walter R. Rouse: Mr. W. H. Hulsizer Mr. R. M. Sutton Mr. Calvin M. Cory) I have a copy of your letter of December IS, 1951« to Mr. Stoddard referring to the suggestions contained in my letter of December 4» 1951» to Mr. Reinhardt relating to transfer of the water production facilities of the Railroad at Las Vegas, Nevada, to a separate distribution company. At the present time my views as to the questions which you raised in your letter upon which you desire my comments are only tentative. However X am writing you now so as to suggest that an investigation be made by the proper departments as to the feasibility or tne Railroad Company*s developing its own water supply if the transfer of the water production facilities located in the water field which serves domestic water to the City of Las Vegas is consummated. My present view is that there would be some difficulty in making a contract whereby the distribution company could furnish the Railroad Company an assured supply of not less than 2.5 cubic feet of ^ r p e r s e c o n d at cost. The Railroad*s appropriation of 2.5 Jubic feet of water per second relates to Well No. 1 in the water field, which would be sold to the distribution company, and the distribution company would become the operator of the well and the transmission system through which the water would be delivered to the Railroad Company. Since the distribution company would be a public utility. I doubt if it would be able to make a valid contract whereby it could furnish a ** cpoesrts onwsh icshe rwvoeudl db yb et hep arsaammoe unutt itloi t*y. * S*Ufe*h a* Co*nwt*r~a!c*+t would he subject to the claim that it was dxscrimina^“ tory and in violation of the statutes whicll{.prohibit a utility from charging a greater or less compensation DEC 24 1951 L» C . O. r