UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
NmI«.D. 3247 - Easement from LA&SL-UPRR to LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT for water pipelines at Las Vegas, Los Angeles, September 30, i960 80-11 Mr. Calvin M. Cory: ec - Mr. T. E. Hararaill Mr. T, E, Hammill has now returned the above proposed Easement, in aocordanee with his letter of September 28, I960, in which he points out that this Easement is part of the water system of the Las Vegas Valley Water District which connects with the grant of easement made in LA&SL Audit No, 5352, dated June 1, 1954. That easement was unilateral in form and as I have recently advised, it Is desirable that easements of this sort be bilateral in fora, Therefor®, I am returning herewith all copies of proposed ?,N ,,L.D. 3247 heretofore forwarded to me, for revision in such manner as to contain provisions similar to those of Audit No. 5352, but in bilateral form. MD:MF Edward C. Renwick 2018-11-26 2018-11-26 http://cdm17304.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p17304coll5/id/27… 27237 27238.pdfpage /p17304coll5/image/27238.pdfpage
