Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000054 66

Image

File
Download upr000054-066.tif (image/tiff; 25.99 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000054-066
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

Mr. Reinhardt #5. / ml g fp^ Hsoa-€o4‘Be--baiek-.«,«€. trying to collect water bills for air conditioning artf^efrigeration service from consumers who had never been billed J&ts attempt .had. ever been made - %©- e©llee#i‘-f©r'"-'&i3i’S serv-ie-e. Item 5/Page 13. The Commission finds that the Las Vegas Land and Water Company should in equity reimburse those customers who have paid for service under the 1951 schedule of Rates #21 (effective Sept. 1, 1951) for cooling water ajad refrigeration machines. The amount collected for refrigeration and air conditioning / wA subsequent to Sept. 1, 1951 underRate #21 .dafto*^rf June 30, 1953 amounts to $2350.70 which includes $214-8.50 now being held in a separate water company account, the difference of $202.20 represents amount paid by consumers during the period Sept. 1, to Dec. 31, 1951. Referring to the last paragraph of the Commissions order on Page 17 which states that "the Las Vegas Land and Water Company is authorized to refund any overcharges and waive any under charges for this type of service which may have occurred prior to the effective date of this order", I believe that my comments under Items 2 to 5 inclusive of Commissions findings will furnish the information required by the above mentioned paragraph<?the-?0'&ffim-i-8'&l-oiBe&-~arder. It is my thought that the question as to whether refunds authorized by the Commission should or should not be made^should be ''decided by the legal department and executives of the Water Company.