Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000279 64

Image

File
Download upr000279-064.tif (image/tiff; 26.85 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000279-064
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    » 1 Res IAS VEGAS ZAiffi & WATER COMPANY - Water Hate Hearing Bear Mr. Bennett: This will acknowledge receipt of the copy of your letter dated April 11th to Mr* Allen, Chairman of the Nevada Commission, in which the hearing date for the adjourned hearing is to be June 5th, and the note that such is agreeable to the Commission and the City of Las Vegas* I shall set aside that week for that purpose. In accordance with discussions with yourself, Mr. Renwiek and Mr* Johnson, the following program is set down for your consideration: A - Summary of Results of Operation: A revised estimate for 1951 should be prepared and set up on a single sheet and be available for introduction in evidence <* if conditions warrant* Such revised estimate should be made in order to reflect the actual results for the first four months* Questions at the hearing were raised as to what January and February showed. In any adjourned hearing, actualities must always be met. All applicants for rate increases always face that situation. In order that there be no further delays, or that our showing be not at a disadvantage, such a revised estimate is essential, in ay opinion. If it happens there is no important difference, such much the better. However, I&*. Johnson tells me that, under his management, some added revenues are being realised from old customers. Operating expenses will probably be higher than estimated and new service connections may likewise be higher - though, in reference to the latter, a higher rate of growth in the early part of the year does not necessarily mean a continuation throughout the year, especially in view of material restrictions. B * Rates and Rate Increases: The growth and changes in customers for the year 1950 by rate classifications has now been completed by Mr. BertolaedL, with assistance from Mr. Johnson*s office. The number of such customer i - W Q m m ^*6?| S A N F R A N C I S C O 4, C A L I F O R N I A r..A - ? ^ J ^ " I 660 Market Street* w m m S B l K J - R ? Y A . W E H E C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R April lit, 1951. Mr. B. I. Bennett, General Solicitor, Uhlan Pacific Railroad Company, It22 West Sl*th Street, Los Angeles, California.