Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000285 223

Image

File
Download upr000285-223.tif (image/tiff; 34.68 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000285-223
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 « t© this end the said c ity i s hereby authorised t© * « * . * * pur©has® o f any water company, water works within said city* and it was held that th is conferred the right to condemn the plant and franchise of the water company fo r the benefit o f the city, and the Court adds that the righ t of eminent domain in such cases is not questioned* In re Mayor etc* o f City o f Hew York, SI H*E* 1043 (H.Y.) , 31 im. St. Hep* 823* in act empowering the city to ac­quire by eraiaent domain a l l wharf property within it s lim its washeld su ffic ie n t to enable the city to condemn wharf property owned by a railro ad and a gas company and actually occupied by them f o r public use* Hairing in Blind this more extended and b en e fic ia l public use employ­ed by municipal corporations as a governmental agency we w ill re fe r to our statute. Its language as applied to the use here sought I sj ’ That any incorporated city * i * | be and is hereby authorised * * • to construct* condemn and purchase, purchase, acquire, add to, main­tain and operate works, plants'and- fa c ilit ie s fo r the purpose o f furnishing sueh c ity or town and the inhabit­ants thereof and any other person with gas, e le c tric ity and other means o f power and f a c ilit i e s fo r ligh tin g, heating, fu e l and power purposes.’ It would seem that in the .employment o f such language i t was the intention o f the le g isla tu re to expressly grant the power o f con­demnation of property devoted to a public use *. * . * The whole tenor of the act is a manifest intention to confer upon c itie s the right to acquire a l l existing public u t i li t i e s , either by condemnation or purchase, or to construct th eir own plants fo r such purposes.** The case o f state vs Superior Court o f King County grew out o f a proceeding brought by the Gity of Seattle to condemn fo r municipal purposes certain of the railway property of a street railway company. The le g is la tiv e grant o f power to the city to maintain the proceeding recited that any incorporated city is hereby authorised to construct, condemn and purchase, purchase, acquire, add to, m in tain , operate or lease cable, e le c tric and other reailways within the lim its of such city fo r the trans­portation of freigh t and passengers, another section provides that whenever the city council deems i t advisable that the city sh all acquire the public u t ilit y mentioned, that i t provide therefor by ordinance, which ordinance sh all specify and adopt the system or plan proposed and declare the estimated cost thereof, etc. and the same is submitted fo r ra tific a tio n to the qu alified voters at a general or special election* the act also provided that i f i t is necessary to condemn land or other property fo r such purpose the city shall-provide therefor by ordinance,