Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 « t© this end the said c ity i s hereby authorised t© * « * . * * pur©has® o f any water company, water works within said city* and it was held that th is conferred the right to condemn the plant and franchise of the water company fo r the benefit o f the city, and the Court adds that the righ t of eminent domain in such cases is not questioned* In re Mayor etc* o f City o f Hew York, SI H*E* 1043 (H.Y.) , 31 im. St. Hep* 823* in act empowering the city to acquire by eraiaent domain a l l wharf property within it s lim its washeld su ffic ie n t to enable the city to condemn wharf property owned by a railro ad and a gas company and actually occupied by them f o r public use* Hairing in Blind this more extended and b en e fic ia l public use employed by municipal corporations as a governmental agency we w ill re fe r to our statute. Its language as applied to the use here sought I sj ’ That any incorporated city * i * | be and is hereby authorised * * • to construct* condemn and purchase, purchase, acquire, add to, maintain and operate works, plants'and- fa c ilit ie s fo r the purpose o f furnishing sueh c ity or town and the inhabitants thereof and any other person with gas, e le c tric ity and other means o f power and f a c ilit i e s fo r ligh tin g, heating, fu e l and power purposes.’ It would seem that in the .employment o f such language i t was the intention o f the le g isla tu re to expressly grant the power o f condemnation of property devoted to a public use *. * . * The whole tenor of the act is a manifest intention to confer upon c itie s the right to acquire a l l existing public u t i li t i e s , either by condemnation or purchase, or to construct th eir own plants fo r such purposes.** The case o f state vs Superior Court o f King County grew out o f a proceeding brought by the Gity of Seattle to condemn fo r municipal purposes certain of the railway property of a street railway company. The le g is la tiv e grant o f power to the city to maintain the proceeding recited that any incorporated city is hereby authorised to construct, condemn and purchase, purchase, acquire, add to, m in tain , operate or lease cable, e le c tric and other reailways within the lim its of such city fo r the transportation of freigh t and passengers, another section provides that whenever the city council deems i t advisable that the city sh all acquire the public u t ilit y mentioned, that i t provide therefor by ordinance, which ordinance sh all specify and adopt the system or plan proposed and declare the estimated cost thereof, etc. and the same is submitted fo r ra tific a tio n to the qu alified voters at a general or special election* the act also provided that i f i t is necessary to condemn land or other property fo r such purpose the city shall-provide therefor by ordinance,