Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000062 276

Image

File
Download upr000062-276.tif (image/tiff; 26.42 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000062-276
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    A# a practical siatter, the advances received urds** tfele heading (carried in Account. 178) have been rand© almost entire­ly by developments carried m by reel estate subdividers and net by indlvidual hmm owners*. Tim advances received for &f*f# purpose prior to 1948 sere very smell, in the last few years, witfe the rapid expansion and opening of new subdivisions* the advene** here been very considerable. The unrefunded amounts as of the end of tbs years shown are; Analysis of this account shows that the initial advance collected includes the estimated cost of Installation piss 1<^ for supervision and overhead, Tim 1€0, chile subject to refund, is not capitalized • This means that the actual plant in service, as represented by the #808,147,97 as of December 81, 1949, was less fey some !<#, i. e. $809,147.97, is equal to and 100$ is equal to #199,800, A study made indicated that but apiv*exi®ately 68$ of the advance would fee returned in a 10-year period at 80$ of the revenue* currently feeing received. It mat fee concluded that any advance that does not pay cut within a period of 10 year* at the very liberal refund at cue-half of each year*s revenue, Is an uneconomic extension, and the eubdivlder and/or customer should mbs a permanent contribution towards the main extensions support to that extent* To fee conservative, and giving weight t© the pending increase in water rates, it is concluded that 70$ of the 1944 48 46 47 48 49 $ 6,890,48 88,687,78 48,166,80 88,898*89 107,010,17 808,147,97