Image
Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
Mr. Wm. Reinhardt » Pag® 2 !il§t Sept. 5, 1952 With respect to Paragraph (f), the encumbrance of the lands and the reservation not to drill, would have to be modified to take care of the additional shop well and any possible well on the Stewart Ranch, which seemb to be agreeable to both Mr, McN&mee and Mr. Butterfield. X suggested that we thought the fifty-year period was too long and also suggested we limit such encumbrances to lands immediately abutting the water-bearing lands. Mr. Butterfield stated he personally saw no objection to that but he would have to discuss it with Mr. Montgomery or seme water engineer. X then discussed the draft of the contract referred to In the fourth paragraph of my letter relative to the removal of the facilities from certain of our lands not acquired fey the District and the granting of easements over our lands to connect with relocated facilities of the District. In general, there did not seem to be any particular objection to the contract although Mr. Butterfield stated Mr. Montgomery had seme rather inchoate ideas which he was trying to formulate into something definite with respect to an-entirely new setup for transmission lines and that nothing could be don® until they had a report from Mr, Montgomery. The paragraph in the proposed contract relating to the forfeiture of the Trust Fund in the event the two main transmission lines were not removed from our property did not meet with any great enthusiasm from either Mr. Butterfield or Mr. McNamee, . It was agreed that our meeting was entirely informal and that nobody was commitlng either the District or the Railroad to these suggested changes or modifications tout I was submitting them as our Informal views of our proposal and they were received as such. Mr. Butterfield stated Mr, Campbell would net be back until the tenth of the month and that nothing could be done until his return. E. E. Be nett EEB:AFK Mr Coryi Herewith copy of bid in question which I don’t believe you ever received and copy of my letter of August 29th to Mr. Rouse. E.E.B, -