Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

man000177 108

Image

File
Download man000177-108.tif (image/tiff; 26.88 MB)

Information

Digital ID

man000177-108
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 13? South 4th Street Las Vegas, Nevada July 22, 1952 Mr. William Reinhardt, Vice President Union Pacific Railroad Company 422 West Sixth Street Los Angeles 14, California Dear Sirs Enclosed is a statement, entitled "Appendix A", which summarizes and details the appraisals made hy the engineers of both the Union Pacific Railroad Company and the Las Vegas Valley Water District. The figures presented in the first three lines of the summary were worked out jointly hy your engineers and hy our engineer and his staff. These figures are comparable except that most of your appraisal is as of December 31, 1950* The Water District's appraisal, for the most part, is based on the physical property existing December 31, 1950 but with prices based on May 1, 1952. Your figures for additions and betterments from December 31, 1950 to May 1, 1952 have been used in our appraisal. In the fourth line of the summary, "land and water rights", we have used your valuation but we are having a check appraisal made by a recog­nized firm of appraisers. The summary shows deductions of $390,893 for the following: Overhead $204,829 Remove and replace pavement 76,564 Accrued depreciation 1/1/51 to 5/1/52 109.500 Total $390,893 The overhead item which you have included in your valuation is comprised of engineering, general expense, interest during construction and, in the case of additions and betterments to the production facilities since December 31, 1950, freight. You will note in the detail, page III of the Appendix, that our figures for overhead on the distribution system are higher than yours, This is because our overhead calculation was based on Mr. Maag's original figure of 8.706556 while yours is based on a revised figure of 6.35930.