Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000105 169

Image

File
Download upr000105-169.tif (image/tiff; 23.7 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000105-169
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Mr. W. R. Rouse 2 , May 19, 1953 / esBary to encumber our land with this covenant prior to the sale to the District, but in order to carry out the commitment which had been made in conferences with the District that the Railroads would create a covenant run­ning with the land which would benefit the water-bearing lands to be conveyed to the District, it was found nec­essary to insert the covenant in the first conveyance of the water-bearing land made by the LA&SL so that the req­uisite privity of estate would exist. I enclose an of­fice memorandum, which is not exhaustive, but which dis­closes the reasons why it was necessary to Include the covenant in the deeds used in the inter-company transfer. It is ray suggestion that the two deeds involved in the inter-company transfer be not recorded until the water­bearing land Is sold to the District or until such prior time as the Railroad may desire to sell the land bur­dened with the covenant. I do not think it is advisable to transfer the 2.5 c.f.s. of water appropriation owned by LA&SL in Well No. 1 in the water field to the existing well and new wells in the shop grounds until the Railroad pipe lines and storage facilities in the railroad yards have been com­pleted. I understand this will take several months. Therefore it was necessary to have a contract between the Water Company and the Railroads whereby the Water Company would deliver to the Railroad during this inter­im period the water whieh the Railroad was entitled to appropriate from Well No, 1. If we did not follow this procedure, it would be ray opinion that the Water Company would have to charge the Railroad Company tariff rates for any water delivered to it. I believe the rest of the contract is self-explanatory. When the Water Company takes over the water produc­tion, distribution and transmission facilities, it will be necessary for the management to determine whether the work of maintaining and operating the water field will be performed by new forces employed by the water Company or whether the Railroad Company can do this work for the Water Company at actual cost. Mr. Reinhardt felt that this was a matter which we should not attempt to cover in this contract, and I am inclined to agree.